Report Reveals DC’s 43 Walkable Urban Places

by Shilpi Paul

Report Reveals DC's 43 Walkable Urban Places: Figure 1
The DC area’s WalkUPs. Courtesy of the report.

George Washington University professor Chris Leinberger believes that the DC area is doing urban development right.

“All of my research kept on showing that metro DC was the model — this is where the country was heading,” he said to a large crowd at George Washington University’s Jack Morton Auditorium.

On Tuesday, The Urban Land Institute, in collaboration with George Washington University, hosted a conference in honor of Leinberger’s recently released report: DC: The WalkUP Wake-Up Call. The Nation’s Capitol as a National Model for Walkable Urban Places. The day started off with a panel about the report, and the rest of the day’s schedule featured discussions inspired by Leinberger’s report.

In the report, Leinberger identified 43 Walkable Urban Places (WalkUPS) in the region, and then examined them to find out how they have evolved, what they are comprised of, and what the economic data reveals. These areas are relatively small — around 400 acres — and can be divided into six categories: downtown, downtown adjacent, urban commercial (like H Street and Georgetown), suburban town centers, strip commercial redevelopments (like Tyson’s Corner and Wheaton) and greenfields (planned communities that emerge whole, like National Harbor).

Here are a few facts that Leinberger dug up:

  • Rental apartments are making a move into WalkUPs. In the 1990s, 12 percent of the region’s apartment space was in these areas; today, the percentage is 42.
  • Retail, though growing, lags behind apartments. Today, 13 percent of the region’s retail exists in WalkUPs, up from 8 percent in the 90s.
  • Suburban office parks used to draw a higher rent than urban buildings; now that relationship has reversed.
  • Housing prices have also flipped; twenty years ago, McLean boasted a higher price per square foot than West End; today, West End wins out.

Tysons Corner and White Flint, which are both in the process of switching from suburban models into walkable urban places, are very significant and will be interesting to watch, thinks Leinberger. “We will see three or four walkable spaces emerge from Tysons Corner,” he predicted.

During the panel, economist Richard Green brought up a couple critiques of Leinberger’s report. He noted that DC’s growth and recent success cannot just be tied to its walkable structure, crediting Mayor Anthony Williams, among others, with rejuvenating the city. He also wondered if all areas need to satisfy every age group; while the District is great for those in the 20s, 60s and 70s, he thought, maybe the city shouldn’t work so hard to make itself desirable to people in their 30s and 40s, who perhaps need better schools and more parking, both of which are offered in the suburbs.

Check out the full report here.

See other articles related to: walkability, urban land institute, smart growth

This article originally published at http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/report_reveals_dcs_43_walkable_urban_places/6010


  1. Dana Hollish Hill said at 8:44 pm on Tuesday September 11, 2012:
    Home buyers have been telling us this for years and I'm surprised that the real estate multiple listing service does not include a "Walkscore" field yet. Young people are moving to the city and staying to raise their families. Empty nesters are selling the big suburban home and moving into the metro-accessible towncenters. The next step for DC is to get the performance of the public schools to a level where DC can really compete with the neighboring counties.
  1. Diane said at 12:50 am on Wednesday September 12, 2012:
    I was perplexed by the numbering shown on the map above. The numbers do not reflect a rating. The study author ordered his WalkUP places alphabetically and then numbered them in order. The actual report does include some rankings within the places selected as WalkUPs.
  1. a said at 2:53 pm on Wednesday September 12, 2012:
    in reference to Richard Green's argument Much of DCs desirable urban single unit housing stock is uniquely a poor fit for people in their 20s (cost) and 60s+ (multiple floors, upkeep, opposite of "downsizing"). There are plenty of people in their 30s and 40s without kids/family, and they tend to be either in or approaching their peak earning years. They can afford the inflated costs of desirable urban living better than newly minted college grads or those on fixed income. The suburban argument is phenomenally lame -- DC shouldn't try to have better schools for anyone they serve? Really? Families want the best schools wherever they live. Suburbs have no inherent advantage other than a history of siphoning higher socio economic families from cities and paying for it with phenomenally high property taxes. For many families moving to the suburbs severely compromises their quality of life.

DC Real Estate Guides

Short guides to navigating the DC-area real estate market

We've collected all our helpful guides for buying, selling and renting in and around Washington, DC in one place. Visit guides.urbanturf.com or start browsing below!