After years of public debate and development delays, the DC Council resumed consideration of amendments to the city's Comprehensive Plan on Tuesday — and the implications of passage remain unclear.
Council Chair Phil Mendelson released a revised draft of the “Comprehensive Plan Amendment Act of 2020" on Monday, an update to the 2006 Comp Plan that is meant to serve as a prescriptive guide for, among other things, planning, land use, and development in DC. Bodies like the Zoning Commission use the Comp Plan as a reference document to ensure their decision-making around zoning and development is compatible with the Plan's contents.
One of the primary points of concern for many councilmembers during Tuesday's bill mark-up was the lingering deficit of provisions that address racial equity, highlighted in a report released Monday by the Council Office of Racial Equity (CORE). The report stated that while the Comp Plan amendments were an improvement on the existing document as far as addressing racial equity, the amendments still don't go far enough in creating the conditions to disrupt the status quo. Over the past decade-plus, that status quo has been one of growing inequities and displacement of often long-term low-income, Black, and Latinx residents. A few councilmembers stated that the Plan wouldn't adequately address equity until it is rewritten entirely, a process that is seemingly just around the corner.
Councilmembers also expressed confusion about new language in the document that seemed unclear or contradictory. A concern raised by Councilmembers like Mary Cheh and Robert White was the revival of phrases like "respecting neighborhood character" in the current draft, previously excised in the draft circulated by the Mayor and the Office of Planning because of how these phrases are often applied to maintain exclusivity in low-density parts of the city.
One of the newly-added portions of the Plan that seemed to encapsulate the concerns around racial equity and opacity is a section that states that before any zoning changes are made in the nine areas labelled for "Future Planning Analysis", additional planning resulting in vaguely-worded "guiding documents" (eg. studies, frameworks, etc.) must be completed. Those areas include the Connecticut Avenue and Wisconsin Avenue corridors, and a swath covering both Foggy Bottom/West End and Georgetown, all parts of the city that are considered averse to development.
The most prominent of the planning efforts listed under this section is the Small Area Plan, a typically lengthy process currently underway for a portion of the Connecticut Avenue corridor.
"Requiring a Small Area Plan for areas where you want increased density maintains the status quo for a period of time until the Small Area Plan is complete, and I know, having been in the District, we've never done a Small Area Plan in like, six months," Councilmember Christina Henderson remarked, asking for clarification.
The Chair noted that other means of planning — including the planned unit development processes that have provided a means of legal challenges for parties opposed — would also satisfy the requirement for additional planning, and later suggested that the Council can remove certain areas from that "Future Planning Analysis" designation. This was an insufficient response for some, however.
"Language matters," Councilmember Elissa Silverman said, reiterating the issues around phrasing throughout the existing Comp Plan that opened the door for exacerbating inequities. "If we don't do things differently than we've done in the past, we're going to get the same outcome, which is a racially inequitable city."
Chair Mendelson offered to meet with councilmembers in private to go over their concerns more thoroughly. Ultimately, however, the Chair agreed that the CORE analysis suggests that the only means of getting a Comp Plan that addresses racial equity in a meaningful way will be through rewriting it entirely.
The first reading of the Comp Plan amendment bill is scheduled for May 4th.
This article originally published at https://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/dc-council-finally-resumes-discussion-on-the-comprehensive-plan/18159.
Most Popular... This Week • Last 30 Days • Ever
Here's what you need to know about reporting profit made from the sale of your home.... read »
Crescent Communities recently filed plans with Montgomery County for Novel Bethesda, ... read »
As we approach the end of the year, UrbanTurf is taking a final look at the DC neighb... read »
Steuart Investment Company and BXP have filed renderings for alternate ideas for how ... read »
Today, UrbanTurf is looking at the five DC neighborhoods that have been the most affo... read »
The preferred mortgage product among most home buyers is the fixed-rate mortgage. How... read »
To help home buyers and sellers both novice and seasoned, UrbanTurf is running a seri... read »
The development for four parcels at The Yards from Brookfield Properties and the Menk... read »
Plans for the New York-based eatery appear to be moving forward.... read »
The zip codes that are home to Brentwood, Takoma Park and sections of Hyattsville top... read »
With this weekend's DC houseboat tour a day away, UrbanTurf thought it only fitting t... read »
President Obama travels to Denver this morning to sign the stimulus bill that has bee... read »
In this week's installment of Ask An Agent, a reader wonders if there is a rule for h... read »
As The Wharf prepares to begin construction, DC's houseboat community heads to its ne... read »
In this week's installment of Ask An Agent, a reader asks a fairly common question th... read »
DC Real Estate Guides
Short guides to navigating the DC-area real estate market
We've collected all our helpful guides for buying, selling and renting in and around Washington, DC in one place. Visit guides.urbanturf.com or start browsing below!
Intro guides for first-time home buyers
Awesome and unusual real estate from across the DC Metro