Proposals for Shaw’s Parcel 42: The Results

by Shilpi Paul

image
Parcel 42. Google Maps.

Last Thursday, UrbanTurf outlined the six proposals competing for the redevelopment of Parcel 42, a plot of land in Shaw at the intersection of 7th Street and Rhode Island Avenue NW (map). The city wants to see a mixed-use, community-friendly project at the address, which is vacant but very close to several exciting development projects: Progression Place is around the corner, and the revamped Howard Theater and burgeoning restaurant district surrounding it is just a few blocks away.

We polled readers on their favorites and got a huge response, with over 1,676 total votes being cast.

So, what do readers want?

image
Click to enlarge.

The winning proposal was United House of Prayer’s 50-unit apartment building with a community garden. However, late Friday, we received word that the United House of Prayer had solicited votes for the poll via a mass email to their wider congregation, which stretches as far as California (we got a call from someone on the West Coast wondering why she was being asked to vote on this topic). While the plan may have won the poll without this solicitation, we wanted to share what we learned. Of course, informal polls of this nature are always unscientific, and we will never know whose social networks were tapped to solicit votes.

image
Rendering of the United House of Prayer proposal.

Coming in a respectable second place was the plan from Neighborhood Development Corporation (NDC), which proposed 81 or 90 units and a Yes! Organic market. NDC’s signed commitment from Yes! may have been appealing to neighbors.

The third most popular option was the plan with the largest amount of public space: the Four Points/Warrenton Group’s proposal, which calls for 96 residential units ranging from townhouses to lofts, and a large public staircase and courtyard.

The fourth most voted for option was the 100-unit residential building with ground-floor retail and several liv-work spaces from POUNDS Properties and Jubilee Housing. 40 percent of the units in this project would be affordable.

The city will be choosing their own favorite in the coming months; we’ll keep you updated as the project progresses.

See other articles related to: shaw, parcel 42

This article originally published at http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/proposals_for_shaws_parcel_42_the_winner_is/6315

13 Comments

  1. AP said at 1:22 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    What a joke.  The UHOP proposal should have been disqualified.  I thought this was supposed to be a fun community-based poll by local residents and neighbors.  Way to kill the spirit of the poll by mass emailing it out to people as far away as California!

    Almost every blog I’ve read has the UHOP proposal as being towards the bottom of the list.  I think the second place proposal from NDC should be the real winner here.  It also seems to be the most popular on the other blogs as well.  I guess we’ll see how much support UHOP has at the community meetings…

  1. Payton said at 1:46 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    Thanks for clarifying how the voting went! Half as many apartment units, and with even more parking, does little to help a city that has a severe shortage of housing for people (“for all people,” I might add, not “for all cars”).

    FWIW, checked into the hotel developers and they mostly run limited-service hotels along the East Coast. Holiday Inn Express, Hampton Inn, TownePlace Suites, etc.

  1. Mike said at 2:01 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    UHOP should be ashamed of themselves. As a Shaw resident, I will do everything in my power to make sure that they have no chance at P42. This signals that they care nothing about the honest desires of the community. The hotel idea seems to be the most beneficial, economically.

  1. jacksom said at 2:08 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    Really???  This proposal is by far the least interesting design. As mentioned above, this proposal has only 50 units when the other proposals almost double that amount. With the shortage of housing (especially affordable) in DC and the proximity of this location to 3 metro stations, this site should be built to maximum density. I second that UHOP should be disqualified. Soliciting votes from people who could give a rat’s ass about what’s going on in DC is not fair to those who do care.

  1. jacksom said at 2:28 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    And I want to add, the amount of parking should be minimized. As I mentioned above, 3 metro stations are with walking distance. Fifty units and sixty parking spaces is ridiculous.

  1. Mark Wellborn said at 2:44 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    jackson,

    There is a typo in the chart. There are 18 parking spaces associated with the UHOP project, not 50.

    Mark Wellborn
    Editor

  1. FrankNYC said at 6:39 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    I’m not living in the DC-area, but visit often, and I knew a good thing when I saw it. I voted for the second design because it made the most sense and fit the vibe of the area as well.
    Not sure what the rest of the country was seeing, but as a designer, I can tell you, the average person always gets turned-on by “the modern look” and that’s about it.

  1. mla said at 7:17 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    NDC’s second option was by far the best option of all presented.  Why not show some of the other designs since you admit UHOP may not have been playing fairly?

  1. Mark Wellborn said at 7:22 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    mla,

    The article from last Thursday where all the proposals and renderings are covered is linked in the first line of the story. Here it is again for your convenience:

    http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/six_proposals_for_shaws_parcel_42_revealed/6299

    Mark Wellborn
    Editor

  1. Q-Street said at 7:25 pm on Monday November 19, 2012:

    I do not trust UHOP or Reitig to ultimately construct a building that looks anything like the renderings they show to the community. The building next to Parcel 42 was presented with a similar rendering a while ago, and they ended up building a gray/maroon/yellow prefab-panel mess that looks like a college dormitory mistake from the 70’s.

    @Jackson. Your implying some increased access to public transit over and above access to the shaw station, when there really is none. All three stations within walking distance are on the same line. No one is going to walk 8 blocks to U street metro, or 6 to the Mt. Vernon metro, just to be on the same line 1 stop away from the metro that they live directly above.

    Also parking is an issue for the residential streets in that area. There is a strong push from the community to have enough parking in any new structure to completely contain the influx of new residents’ vehicles. The tidy idea that people in DC will abandon their cars entirely in favor of rapid transit hasn’t quite played out; I don’t think it’s going to miraculously begin with parcel 42.

  1. Payton said at 10:13 am on Tuesday November 20, 2012:

    Actually, Q-Street, the number of registered vehicles in the city continues to decline even as the population increases. As the community gains even more services, it will become even more convenient to walk and even fewer people will want to own cars.

  1. Q-Street said at 8:48 pm on Tuesday November 20, 2012:

    Actually Payton, that’s not true. Per a study by the national capitol region transportation planning board, the number of registered vehicles in DC has increased 3% and is up 4% in the DC metro area from 2008-2011.

    I’m a public transit fanatic, but you have to be completely blind to the chronic overestimation of public transit’s impact on car ownership. It’s swell that new urbanists like to talk about idealistic outcomes in a walkable and transit oriented community, but some of us have to find a parking spot in the real world.

    Parcel 42 is at a three way intersection of an arterial, a commercial corridor and a one-way street with no shoulder parking. There aren’t places for residents to park. Minimizing parking in that development will only accomplish creating headaches for the surrounding residential blocks who have limited parking as it is.

  1. CMB said at 2:12 am on Wednesday November 21, 2012:

    Here’s the e-mail and I live in the South:


    Peace all,

    We need your help!!  Last night the UHOP made a presentation to the community at Watha T. Daniel Library and there are 6 developers who are trying to be rewarded the property to build.  Please click on the link below and vote for the UHOP to be awarded the property.  Scroll down and find the UHOP rendering and vote. Please pass this on to everyone you know who will vote for the UHOP in this regard.  We need your help!  It will only take a minute.  Thanks and pass it on.


    They’re a bunch of scheming greedy individuals

Join the discussion

UrbanTurf now requires registration in order to post comments. Register here, or login below if you are already registered.

Click here if you forgot your password.




 

Marriott + Schnepp

Coldwell Banker Dupont

202.997.5192

Serving:

Dupont Circle

NEW!

DC Real Estate Guides

Short guides to navigating the DC-area real estate market

We’ve collected all our helpful guides for buying, selling and renting in and around Washington, DC in one place. Visit guides.urbanturf.com or start browsing below!

Northern Virginia

Profiles of 14 neighborhoods across Northern Virginia

Ballston
Looking to Give People A Reason to Stay Past 6pm
Clarendon
Happily Straddling the Line Between City and Suburb
Columbia Pike
Arlington’s Neglected Stepchild is Getting a Makeover
Crystal City
Turning Lemons into Lemonade
Lyon Village
Developing An Air of Exclusivity?
Rosslyn
Hitting Its Growth Spurt
Shirlington
An Urban Village Hitting Its Stride
Del Ray
Virginia’s Small Town Near the Big City
Eisenhower Avenue
The Vibrancy Might Take a Few Years
Huntington
The Quiet Neighborhood By the Beltway
Old Town
Mayberry By The Potomac
Parkfairfax
132 Commerical-Free Acres
Downtown Falls Church
Staying the Same in the Midst of Change
Tysons Corner
Radical Change Could Be On The Way

See more Northern Virginia »

Maryland

Profiles of 14 neighborhoods in suburban Maryland

Annapolis
Small-Town Living in the State Capital
Bethesda
Bedroom Community Gets Buzzing Cache
Cabin John
In With The New While Maintaining the Old
Chevy Chase
Affluence, Green Lawns and Pricey Homes
Downtown Silver Spring
Experiencing a Resurgence After a Bumpy History
Potomac
A Suburb on Steroids
Rockville Town Square
Despite the Dynamism, Still Somewhat Generic
Takoma Park
More Than a Little Bit Quirky
Wheaton
A Foodie Magnet on the Verge of Change
Capitol Heights
Kudzu, Front Porches and Crime
Hyattsville
Glass Half Full or Half Empty?
Mount Rainier
Artists, Affordable Homes and A Silo Full of Corn
National Harbor
A Development Rises Next to the Potomac
Riverdale Park
A Town Looking For Its Identity

See more Maryland »

Northwest DC

30+ neighborhood profiles for the city's biggest quadrant

16th Street Heights
DC's Sleeper Neighborhood
Bloomingdale
Where (Almost) Everyone Knows Your Name
AU Park
One of DC’s Last Frontiers Before the Suburbs
Brightwood
DC’s Northern Neighborhood on the Cusp
Burleith
DC’s 535 House Neighborhood
Cathedral Heights
Do You Know Where That Is?
Chevy Chase DC
Not to Be Confused With the Other Chevy Chase
Cleveland Park
Coming Back After A Rough Year
Columbia Heights
DC’s Most Diverse Neighborhood, But For How Long?
Crestwood
An Island of Serenity East of the Park
Dupont Circle
The Best of DC (For a Price)
Foggy Bottom & West End
Where the Institutional Meets the International
Forest Hills
Ambassadors and Adventurous Architecture
Fort Totten
Five Years Could Make a Big Difference
Foxhall Village
350 Homes Just West of Georgetown
Friendship Heights
A Shopping Mecca With a Few Places to Live
Georgetown
History, Hoyas and H&M
Glover Park
One of DC’s Preppier and More Family-Friendly Neighborhoods
Kalorama
A Posh View From Embassy Row
LeDroit Park
A Quiet Enclave in the Middle of the City
Logan Circle
Trendy Now, But Not By Accident
Mount Pleasant
Sought-After Homes Surround Main Street in Transition
Mount Vernon Triangle
From Seedy to Sought-After
Palisades
The Long, Skinny Neighborhood at the City’s Northwest Edge
Park View
It’s Not Petworth
Penn Quarter/Chinatown
DC’s Go-Go-Go Neighborhood
Petworth
Getting a Vibrancy of Its Own
Shaw
The Duke’s Former Stomping Ground
Shepherd Park
DC’s Garden of Diversity
Spring Valley
A Suburb With a DC Zip Code
Takoma
Not To Be Confused With Takoma Park
Tenleytown
Not Quite Like Its Neighbors
U Street Corridor
The Difference a Decade Makes
Woodley Park
Deceptively Residential
Adams Morgan
No Longer DC’s Hippest Neighborhood, But Still Loved by Residents

See more Northwest DC »

Southwest DC

The little quadrant that could

Southwest Waterfront
A Neighborhood Where A Change Is Gonna Come

See more Southwest DC »

Northeast DC

Profiles of 10 neighborhoods in NE

Brookland
New Development Could Shake Up Pastoral Peace
Deanwood
A Little Bit of Country Just Inside the District’s Borders
Eckington
Not to Be Confused With Bloomingdale
H Street
A Place To Party, and To Settle Down
Langdon
The Northeast Neighborhood That Few Know About
Michigan Park
A Newsletter-On-Your-Doorstep Community
NoMa
Evolving from a Brand to a Neighborhood
Rosedale
Ripe for Investment Right About Now
Trinidad
The Difference 5 Years Makes
Woodridge
Big Houses, A Dusty Commercial Strip and Potential

See more Northeast DC »

Southeast DC

6 'hoods from Capitol Hill to East of the River

Capitol Riverfront
Still Growing
Hill East
Capitol Hill’s Lesser Known Neighbor
Congress Heights
Gradually Rising
Hillcrest
Notable for Its Neighborliness
Historic Anacostia
Future Promise Breeds Cautious Optimism
Eastern Market
A More European Way of Living

See more Southeast DC »

Upcoming Seminars ▾