Freddie Mac has made headlines in recent months for a variety of reasons. However, on Monday, a report from ProPublica and NPR put the lending giant in a particularly bad light.
The collaborative investigation revealed that Freddie Mac had essentially placed multi-million dollar bets that paid off if homeowners maintained mortgages with high interest rates, rather than refinancing.
Traders for Freddie Mac had been increasing bets on portions of mortgages called “inverse floaters”, which are backed by interest, not principal. The higher the interest payments on these mortgages, the more Freddie stood to gain. Conversely, if homeowners refinanced, Freddie lost money. Thus, the report concluded that Freddie had a huge incentive to prevent borrowers from refinancing, even when it would save the homeowner thousands of dollars a year.
ProPublica and NPR are the first to investigate the trades of the tax payer-owned mortgage lender. They found that Freddie began increasing the aforementioned bets in 2010, while simultaneously creating rules that made it harder for homeowners to refinance. However, no evidence was found that the two actions were related, as the traders are apparently “walled off” from those that were imposing higher fees and new rules. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), who serves as Freddie’s Board of Directors, has the power to approve or disapprove trades, said ProPublica, but doesn’t involve itself with day-to-day transactions.
Since the report was published on Monday morning, reactions have been rippling out. The New York Times reported that the Treasury Department will launch an investigation into the matter, and Freddie Mac also issued a statement in response to the claims:
“Freddie Mac is actively supporting efforts for borrowers to realize the benefits of refinancing their mortgages to lower rates,” it said. The company said refinancing accounted for 78 percent of its loan purchases in 2011.
The FHFA announced Monday that they reviewed the trades last year and were concerned. In the statement, they say that Freddie Mac has already stopped engaging in those transactions, limiting a very small percentage of its portfolio to the “inverse floaters.”
This article originally published at http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/freddie_mac_betting_against_homeowners/5031
Most Popular... This Week • Last 30 Days • Ever
The Somerset House, an 84-unit building at 16th and S Street NW, is converting from... read »
Political consultants Mary Matalin and James Carville purchased a 5,000 square-foot... read »
The trouble with open-concept kitchens; the elusive million-dollar home; and a NoMa... read »
UrbanTurf is taking a look at neighborhood-specific housing statistics with the help... read »
How to do concrete floors right; student debt keeping first-time homebuyers from... read »
Eataly has signed a letter of intent for somewhere in the vicinity of 30,000 to... read »
Small living is about to take on a whole new meaning on one of the city's hippest... read »
An oversupply of apartments and an undersupply of condos can't be fixed by... read »
A new Zillow study examined affordability by zip code in the country's top metros.... read »
How much does a deeded parking spot run you in the District? And what about renting?... read »
With this weekend's DC houseboat tour a day away, UrbanTurf thought it only fitting... read »
President Obama travels to Denver this morning to sign the stimulus bill that has... read »
At Wednesday night's ANC 2F Design Review Committee meeting, developers presented... read »
As The Wharf prepares to begin construction, DC's houseboat community heads to its... read »
In this week's installment of Ask An Agent, a reader asks a fairly common question... read »
DC Real Estate Guides
Short guides to navigating the DC-area real estate market
We’ve collected all our helpful guides for buying, selling and renting in and around Washington, DC in one place. Visit guides.urbanturf.com or start browsing below!