Final Stimulus Includes $8,000 Credit and Reinstatement of Loan Limits

President Obama travels to Denver this morning to sign the stimulus bill that has been almost the sole focus of his administration since taking office four weeks ago. The bill, which passed both the House and Senate on Friday, includes a number of measures to address the troubled housing market. Two measures in particular are notable: the $8,000 homebuyer tax credit, and the reinstatement of increased loan limits for FHA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac.
The final $8,000 tax credit might disappoint those who hoped for the original $15,000 that was introduced two weeks ago but was later reduced. Still, the credit is an improvement over the existing $7,500 credit, which was more like an interest-free loan that had to be paid back over 15 years. The new tax credit never has to be repaid, and effectively amounts to an $8,000 discount on the cost of a new home. A few of the key stipulations are:
- Only first-time homebuyers are eligible. (First-time buyers are defined as people who have not owned a principal residence over the three years prior to purchase.)
- The credit only applies to the purchase of a principal residence (i.e., not a vacation home or investment property).
- The credit is actually the lesser of $8,000 or 10 percent of the purchase price of the home. (This distinction only matters to those who purchase a home worth less than $80,000; everybody else gets the full $8,000.)
- The home must be purchased between January 1, 2009 and December 1, 2009.
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has published a handy one-page chart explaining the details of the new $8,000 tax credit and comparing it point-by-point to the existing $7,500 credit.
The second measure reinstates the $729,750 loan limit offered by FHA, Fannie, and Freddie. This loan limit is the threshold at which a mortgage crosses from “conforming” to the much more expensive “jumbo”. The increased loan limit is applied in varying amounts on a county-by-county basis depending on the median price of a home in each locality. The idea is that in more expensive markets, the original conforming loan limit threshold of $417,000 was too low and forced homebuyers into onerous jumbo loans even for homes that were not very expensive by local standards.
NAR published another chart that shows the loan limit in every county around the country. In all counties and cities in the DC metro region the loan limit was increased to the full $729,750, a testament to the very high cost of housing in this area.
As for the stimulus bill, there were a handful of other measures directly or indirectly related to housing. NAR has quick explanations of each:
Join the discussion
Most Popular... This Week • Last 30 Days • Ever

Even with only hard-hat construction tours available of M Street Flats in Mount... read »
Neighborhood Profiles more »
Capitol Riverfront: Still Growing
Tim Brown
March 8th | 21 Comments
Despite being one of the areas in DC hit hardest by the economic downturn, Capitol Riverfront,... read »
- Capitol Riverfront: Still Growing
- The Push East: Trinidad, The Next Frontier
- From Seedy to Sought-After: Mount Vernon Triangle Becoming Urban Village
- Logan Circle: Trendy Now, But Not By Accident
- H Street: A Place To Party, and To Settle Down
Editor's Choice more »
A Proposal: Georgetown Should Secede From DC
Mark Wellborn
March 10th | 10 Comments
In a post that is sure to incite the ire of DC residents, Carol Joynt, a DC columnist for New York... read »
- A Proposal: Georgetown Should Secede From DC
- Unique Spaces: Tilden Street Restaurant Becomes Spacious Home
- Facebook Living at $45,000 a Month
- What $169,500 Buys You in DC: 327 Square Feet
- The Search: Five-Month House Hunt Pays Off For Air Traffic Controller
New Condo Profiles more »
M Street Flats: Fast-Selling Boutique Condos in Mt. Vernon Triangle
Jeremy Castle
March 15th | 2 Comments
Even with only hard-hat construction tours available of M Street Flats in Mount Vernon Triangle,... read »
- M Street Flats: Fast-Selling Boutique Condos in Mt. Vernon Triangle
- Clarendon 3131: Boutique Quality Condos with Space and Convenience
- 900 North Washington Street: Old Town Condos Seeing Green
- The Woodley Wardman: New Condos Amidst Old Money
- The Residences at Liberty Center: Comfortable Convenience With a View
The DC Condo Market more »
Remaining New Condos in the DC Metro: Where Are They?
Will Smith
February 16th | 6 Comments
The recent report on the new condo market from McWilliams|Ballard includes tallies of the remaining... read »
- Remaining New Condos in the DC Metro: Where Are They?
- The New Condo Market in the DC Metro: A Snapshot
- DC Housing Report: November 2009
- The DC Condo Market, Part 5: The Top 20 Fastest Selling Condos
- The DC Condo Market, Part 4: The Coming Condo Shortage (Maybe)
Green Real Estate more »
What $469K Buys You in DC?
Mark Wellborn
March 10th | 5 Comments
In this week's installment of What X Buys You, we look at a two-bedroom row house in Shaw that was... read »
- What $469K Buys You in DC?
- Saving Energy and Money: The Story of The Boston House
- Row House Features DC’s First Solar Chimney
- 900 North Washington Street: Old Town Condos Seeing Green
- DC’s First Carbon Neutral Home Hits the Market
Deal of the Week more »
Deal of the Week: Columbia Heights Convenience for Cheap
Mark Wellborn
March 16th | 3 Comments
For this week's Deal of the Week, we look at a two-bedroom condo on Columbia Road that is just... read »
- Deal of the Week: Columbia Heights Convenience for Cheap
- Deal of the Week: One-Bedroom Penthouse on Logan Circle (With Parking)
- Deal of the Week: An Architect’s Three-Bedroom Near the H Street Corridor
- Deal of the Week: Dupont Two-Bedroom For Under $300K
- Deal of the Week: New Two-Bedroom For Under $370K in Shaw
Renting more »
Rent vs. Buy: Cleveland Park
Michele Lerner
March 19th | 2 Comments
In Rent vs. Buy this week, UrbanTurf looks at Cleveland Park, a neighborhood whose mix of... read »
- Rent vs. Buy: Cleveland Park
- DCRA Launches Rent Your DC Basement Apartment Legally
- Rent vs. Buy: Columbia Heights
- What $750K Buys You in DC?
- Rent vs. Buy: Dupont Circle
Condo Buyers more »
20 Sales in 20 Days at The Floridian in the U Street Corridor
Will Smith
March 19th | 5 Comments
Since its grand re-opening late last month, The Floridian is selling units at a rate of about one... read »
- 20 Sales in 20 Days at The Floridian in the U Street Corridor
- Real Estate’s Unicorn: The Three-bedroom Condo
- M Street Flats: Fast-Selling Boutique Condos in Mt. Vernon Triangle
- New Residential Project for LeDroit Park
- New Condos Could Be on the Way For 14th Street
Unique Spaces more »
Tilden Street Restaurant Becomes Spacious Home
Mark Wellborn
March 2nd | 16 Comments
There are likely very few people in the DC area who can say that they live in a former restaurant.... read »
DC Buyer more »
Small Business Owner Looking for Live/Work Space
Martin Smith
March 17th | 3 Comments
In this week's DC Buyer, we’re working with Alex, a small business owner looking for a live/work... read »
UrbanTurf Reader Asks more »
Are DC Homeowners Seeing Their Tax Assessments Increase?
Mark Wellborn
March 9th | 8 Comments
In this week’s installment of UrbanTurf Reader Asks, a reader who bought a foreclosure in 2009 and... read »
Ask an Agent more »
Should I Buy a Parking Space That is Separate From My Unit?
Mark Wellborn
December 9th | 2 Comments
In this week's installment of Ask An Agent, a reader who bought a condo last year wonders if he... read »
Best New Listings more »
Best New Listings: Adams Morgan and 16th Street Heights (Week of Mar 14th)
Mark Wellborn
March 14th | 1 Comment
This week's Best New Listings include a two-bedroom penthouse co-op in Adams Morgan with parking... read »
- Best New Listings: Adams Morgan and 16th Street Heights (Week of Mar 14th)
- Best New Listings: Logan Circle and AU Park (Week of Mar 8th)
- Best New Listings: Adams Morgan, Columbia Heights, Chevy Chase (Week of Feb 28th)
- Best New Listings: Logan East and Car Barn (Week of Feb 21st)
- Best New Listings: Dreaming of Outdoor Space (Week of Feb 15th)
Luxury Real Estate more »
Guess the Price: Vegas, Vegas, Vegas
Mark Wellborn
March 19th | 6 Comments
UrbanTurf representatives are currently taking in some March Madness basketball in Las Vegas, so it... read »




























































26 Comments
So everyone who purchased a house after April 2008 is screwed by only being elgible for the $7500 that has to be paid back!?
If by “screwed” you mean that you get $500 less in free money taken from your neighbor’s paycheck, then yes.
I agree with Pissed. Those who bought a home before Jan 1, 2009 are getting the shaft, twice. $500 less AND you have to repay.
And Josh, just to clarify, the $7500 credit is a loan, not free money like the new $8000 credit now is.
I dont mind the repayment if it is needed to help the countries situation in the future and dont expect a free hand out i just think they should have changed the previous “credit” also to no repayment. Thank you “also pissed”
I’m worried that because I’m not in foreclosure, or even close to it, I won’t be able to refinance. Are we only going to refinance the irresponsible people who don’t pay their bills? I hope not!
I have searched the current versions of the stimulus bill online and cannot find reference to increasing the jumbo conforming limits to 2008 levels, except for section 12002 in earlier versions of the bill that is labeled to be stricken. I know NAR has published this to be the case, but can anyone actually confirm this?
I don’t mind taking the $7,500 and paying it back….I think the government is gonna take every single penny back from those $8,000. I find it hard to belive that they will just give that money away like nothing…
I feel bad for the people who bought a home in Dec. 08…. This web site has alot of info: http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/
Pissed, great resource, thanks for posting.
Also check out our second post on the tax credit posted later today, Does the Original $7,500 Tax Credit Still Have to Be Repaid?
Will, can you please cite your source for the increase in jumbo conforming loan limits? I see the NAR and some small news sources have stated this, but again, I can’t find it in the actual legislation, and my mortgage loan officer could not confirm this either.
Prospective Buyer, I believe this is it:
http://www.house.gov/billtext/hr1_legtext_cr.pdf
Scroll down to the bottom of page 283. Section 1203 entitled “GSE CONFORMING LOAN LIMITS FOR 2009.”
Here’s the excerpt that pertains to Fannie and Freddie. (Try to make sense of it at your own peril.)
“Loan Limit Floors Based on 2008 Levels—For mortgages originated during calendar year 2009, if the limitation on the maximum original principal obligation of a mortgage that may be purchased by the Federal National Mortgage Association or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation determined under section 302(b)(2) of the Federal National Mortgage Association Charter Act (12 U.S.C. 1717(b)(2)) or section 305(a)(2) of the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation Act (12 U.S.C. 1754(a)(2)), respectively, for any size residence for any area is less than such maximum original principal obligation limitation that was in effect for such size residence for such area for 2008 pursuant to section 201 of the Economic Stimulus Act of 2008 (Public Law 110-185; 122 Stat. 619), notwithstanding any other provision of law, the limitation on the maximum original principal obligation of a mortgage for such Association and Corporation for such size residence for such area shall be such maximum limitation in effect for such size residence for such area for 2008.”
A couple pages above that is the excerpt pertaining to FHA.
Does that help?
Ah, thanks. I’ve been looking here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c111:H.R.1:
and the most recent version listed has this provision stricken out.
Does anyone know when these new limits will be implemented (i.e., how quickly can I take advantage of this and get a conforming loan rate on the $700,000 mortgage I’m trying to get)? I live in one of the high-cost areas that had the higher limit in place in 2008.
question about the 8k refundable tax credit?
is that per home? ie, will a single first time
homebuyer be able to claim the entire
8k?
Charles go to http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/
it has alot of info. the amount is based on 10% of what you pay for the home so if you buy a home for $80,000 you would get he full $8000, if you pay less you get less, if you pay more you max out at the $8000
so is it official? Those who bought Dec 31st or prior (me personally Sep 2008)have to repay, and those who bought Jan 1st or later get it free? can someone direct me to a gov site that spells this out? and also, how can we organize and fight this obvious unfair ruling?
Mark, I am getting screwed to! I keep checking the sites hoping something will change but I doubt it. If I find a site I will let you know. http://www.federalhousingtaxcredit.com/ this site has alot of info on it, nothing really that I cared to hear though. :(
can people who purchased in 2009 in DC take advantage of the DC and Federal credits?
Does anyone know how this works or does anyone have a reference?
Thanks
All of us that were first time homebuyers in 2008 must immediately start writing our congressman. This is totally unfair. We helped the economony by buying in 2008, and now are getting scrwed. It should have been retroactive. Lets all ban together and fight this horrible oversight in legislation.
Yes it is unfair, and just plain stupid. I’ve been bombarding my congressmen for the past week with my thoughts on this change. There was nothing wrong with the original credit, except that it didn’t encompass all of 2008 and 2009. So instead of fixing that, they turned it into ‘free money in 2009’ financed by taxpayers. Unbelievable. Completely unbelievable.
I’m already voting against every single person that voted for this mess come elections… and I’m a Democrat… and I voted for Obama. But this debacle has me disgusted, and I don’t care if I have to vote for a one-eyed chipmunk running for senate… I’m not voting for any of them ever again.
Can we hope for change, is it a possibiity?
I apply for the 7500 but still not eh received my return, I am first time home buyer and I would want to know if in this case changed to 8000 with the new approval of the government?
The new tax credit change is a benefit that is to help our whole economy not just those selfish cry babies posting here and complaining about being shafted. No one held a gun to your head to buy the house under the old rules!
enlightened please go find something better to do with your time…no one cares about your worthless opinion
enlightenedisadouchebag- hahaha thanks you just made reading all of this a little better!
Enlightened needs to become enlightened and realize that nothing in the stimulus plan was very well done. It’s a mass of pork barrel politics the likes of which this country has never seen before. Most of our representatives admit they haven’t even read the whole thing. Our children will be holding the receipt for this spending, years from now, and wonder “what did I buy?”
That aside, I really hope you’re just being a troll, trying to rile people up. I hate to believe Americans can actually think like you do. Just in case anyone else does, let me point you to another group of crybabies: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_Tea_Party
I’m upset that the $7,500.00 credit has to be repaid. It was a great benefit when I bought my home in 2008. Now, I have been promoted to a different state and I have to sell my home. Does anyone know if I have to repay it back immediately or if I still have the 15 years ($500 each year)??????