Are Online Home Value Estimators Helping Buyers and Sellers?

November 14, 2011
1 Comment

Before the days of Zestimates and Trulia Estimates (launched in September), homeowners didn’t have a tool just a few keystrokes away that would provide them with a current value for their home.

Now sites all over the web are, for better or worse, taking a stab at estimating home values and the valuations that are spit out can range rather significantly. For example, I punched the address of the home I recently purchased into a couple estimators to get a better sense of the accuracy. The Zestimate and the Homes.com estimate differed by more than $150,000.

A Wall Street Journal article this weekend looked into whether or not these widely-ranging values actually help buyers and sellers. Estimates unsurprisingly varied, and while some buyers and sellers used the ballpark figures to narrow down their search and set the price, some sellers were startled by extremely low estimates that brought in initial offers far less than the ultimate selling price.

From The Wall Street Journal:

Zillow surfers who read the “About Zestimates” page find out that the site’s overall error rate—the amount its estimates vary from a homes’ actual value—is 8.5%, and that about one-fourth of the estimates are at least 20% off the eventual sale price. In some places, the numbers are far more dramatic: In Hamilton County, Ohio, which includes Cincinnati, it’s 82%. Zillow has accepted revisions on 25 million homes—perhaps the strongest testament to how seriously consumers take its estimates. Automated models aren’t designed to account for the unique construction details that often make or break a deal, or for intangible factors like a neighborhood’s gentrification.

In our interview with Zillow CEO Spencer Rascoff last year, we learned what factors go into the machine to calculate the Zestimate:

It starts with data about the physical characteristics – number of bedrooms, baths, square footage, lot size – of all the homes in an area, and then looks at the relationship between these characteristics and the sale prices of homes in that area. We also track the accuracy of our Zestimates. When a home sells, we compare the Zestimate value from the day before the sale to the actual sale price. Nationwide, our median margin of error when compared against actual sales is 11.1 percent. This accuracy varies by area, and in DC, the margin of error is 9 percent.

Zillow, Trulia, Homes.com and other sites that offer home estimation tools put out very visible disclaimers to buyers and sellers, most notable of which is that the estimates from these sites should not be used in place of a professional assessment of a home’s value. As Rascoff reiterated to UrbanTurf, “a Zestimate is a starting point in determining the value of a home; it’s not an appraisal.”

This article originally published at http://dc.urbanturf.com/articles/blog/a_closer_look_online_home_value_estimators/4570

1 Comment

a said at 12:13 pm on Tuesday November 15, 2011:
I’ve had a similar reaction. Zillow seems to have a bone up it’s ass about the value of my house—lowballing against both recent nearby sales and vs homes on my block with less space, no parking, and no updates. I know Zillow can’t evaluate aesthetics, but I never get why it’s so consistently off. I think the home recordation info may be dated (despite my editing on Zillow), which could impact the number.

I’m often incredulous about prices people get in my neighborhood but it’s never reflected in the Zestimate. Good thing I’m not selling, because it would really annoy me.